1) Relate what was discussed in class or the text to the screening.
In class we discussed the use of extreme close-ups on faces and eyes. The director chose to do this to get the most emotion out of the shots and the actors. We also discussed the symbolism in the dead animals that litter the film. The shot of the dead fox and the many heads of hunting game in Jorgen's office all foreshadow Jorgen's illness and upcoming death.
2) Find a related article and summarize the content.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/movies/30wedd.html
This review talks about the themes of family and "haves and have-nots"(Dargis, 2007). Which is, I think, an interesting way of the looking at the film. Jacob and Helene's relationship being the have-not, after what they gave up almost 20 years prior to the film. The review also talks about the sweeping camerawork and interestingly refers to this style as Dogme-lite. Dogme is a style of filmmaking founded by Lars Von Trier in 1995 that has a long set of rules such as: it must be shot on location, props must not be used, etc. The review says this is Dogme-lite because it uses what looks like a hand-held camerawork style.
3) Apply the article to the film screened in class.
I can see the Dogme influence on the film, as it uses sweeping camera movements and the camerawork looks hand-held at many points. The abrupt editing is also Dogme-like. The article also talks about the theme of bloodline, which can be seen in Jacob's relationship to Anna. The article mentions that Jorgen has the "entitlement as absolute as that of a king" (Dargis, 2007). It also mentions that Jorgen can be charming as well as terrifying, which is very true. The performance by Rolf Lassgard is stunning and he plays the range of Jorgen's emotions with passion.
4) Write a critical analysis of the film, including your personal opinion, formed as a result of the screening, class discussions, text material and the article.
I thought this was a really great film and was engaged with it all the way through. It dealt with heavy themes and at times was beautiful in the way it handled those themes. Mads Mikkelsen plays Jacob beautifully, being a frustrated man caught between two worlds: his life in India at the orphanage and the new life he's been thrust into in Denmark. Rolf Lassgard is terrific as Jorgen, who can be charismatic and charming and turn on a dime to someone terrifying and cruel.
After the Wedding. Susanne Bier. IFC Films. 2007.
Dargis, M. (2007, March 29). Shifty Wedding Crashers: Secrets From the Past. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/movies/30wedd.html
CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM
1) ( x ) I have not handed in this assignment for any other class.
2) ( x ) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly explain that in the paper.
3) ( x ) If I used any passages word for word, I put quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the text.
4) ( x ) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in the text of the paper.
5) ( x ) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally read.
6) ( x ) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in another way. I cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography.
7) ( x ) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality.
8) ( x ) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research and ideas used in my paper.
Name: Melissa Faitoute Date: April 30, 2017